![]() The defendant, the defendant's attorney or an agent of the defendant shall only initiate contact with the victim through the prosecutor's office. ![]() The Arizona law, which appears to be quite unusual among the states, provides: "ailure to effectively moderate a public discussion may be as deleterious to dialogue in such a forum as censorship." There is nothing unreasonable about the University preferring that the interactive comment threads have the look and feel of a brown bag lunch discussion rather than its open-air Library Mall at the foot of State Street. It is reasonable for the University to conclude that these other users may be less inclined to leave a comment, to ask a question, or to engage in on-topic discussion with other users if the University's pages are fraught with off-topic comments…. It also is legitimate for the University to consider the distraction that off-topic comments may present to other users seeking to engage in and to discuss the topic of the University's post. ![]() Allowing off-topic comments to proliferate makes it more difficult for the University to engage with its followers and to see comments to which it may wish to respond. The University also wants to see if anyone has questions, and it may engage in its own speech in the comment threads to answer them. The University uses its Facebook page and Instagram account as channels to communicate official University announcements, events and policies to the public, including its student body, and as a means of promoting the UW-Madison "brand." With respect to the interactive comment threads, the University monitors what other social media users are saying in response to the University's posts, to see how its content is generally being received and to see the reactions its posts are generating. He University has a legitimate, viewpoint-neutral interest in limiting the comment threads to discussion of or reaction to the specific topic of the University's post. Government's restrictions still must be viewpoint neutral and must be "reasonable in light of the purpose served by the forum." In order to show that a speech restriction is "reasonable," the government must show that its restraint: (1) furthers a "permissible objective " and (2) contains "objective, workable standards" that are "capable of reasoned application." Wisc.):Īlthough there is no requirement of narrow tailoring in a nonpublic forum, the ![]() Mnookin, decided yesterday by Magistrate Judge Stephen Crocker (W.D. We will discuss the difficulties in settling down romantically as an itinerant academic, so come join us on this journey from DC to Canada, Oklahoma, Dallas, and finally San Diego.Īlso, what exactly was that guy planning to do on their car ride if Erin hadn't sent his info to her friends in advance? Can even a criminal law professor stay safe from crime by strangers on the Internet? We've got the tea-grab a cup and have a listen!įrom Krasno v. Erin also tells the tale of how a man tried to throw her on the train tracks in Calgary and how an intrepid cowboy intervened just in time to save her life! While last time we had Catgate, this week's episode brings us Fishgate: this vegetarian scholar and her avid fisherman date from the apps did NOT see eye to eye when it comes to how many fish it's okay to kill in a year. ![]() Little snitch alternative professional#Erin Sheley who brings her personal and professional wisdom to the world of online dating.Įrin found love (and indeed, a fiance) on Bumble after dating app adventures across North America. The eleventh episode (Apple Podcasts link here and Spotify link here) of Strangers on the Internet with co-host and psychologist Michelle Lange has us chatting with Prof. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |